Today I conversed with my treating team. Most definitely was I in the psychiatrised clinical space. Spatiality being a duration and field that even my helping hands here know in terms of constraint and the carceral. On glimpsing at Foucault online carceral archipelago I am reminded that even with this typing I am under chronological delineation or stricture by some of the helping hands here.
So my last quiet posture to the doc that dropped the word deconstruction is indeed the non-philosophy or quantic sophisynastery (poet oops!) of Laruelle. Laruelle becomes work - a - day, work a clay putty or DAS plasticine in my hoofs.
The doctor sees a glint of glimmer in my eyes. That equals mania. Mania is a passe term. Is there no reflection here by the good doctor. Here I diatribe.
The Badiousian predicament as bellowed through by di Nicola as heursitic is seen by the doc here as reducationist. Nothing of the sort. The doc quotes Peter Bregan. I know Peter Bregan by online means but when I related about Robert Whitaker and John Read I saw the wince in my psychiatric interlocutors face.
Do not philosophise. No worries on not making the philosophe's gesture of "thinking deeply and laterally". The prevent or pre-event of philosophy. Squint from that perspective. It's all a "raw science"
And now ask my whether my post structural diagrammatics have reached the level of sketching a platypus : ) one for a fave Umberto Eco and his distant interlocutor, Foucault of the devices and archives as unrecovered archipelago.
below is obdurodon..and some burble as self posited magister regens. the doc has 13 years to polish their work and I've 20 years in the public mental health assembly line.
The platypus has a south american cousin